Steve Block <steve.block(a)myrealbox.com> wrote:
Phil Boswell wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Jimmy Wales wrote:
>> THEN, some admin comes along and says, gee, the vote is 27-3 to delete,
>> but frankly, this bridge guy knows what he is talking about, so I am
>> going to close it with a keep.
Please provide links to AfD discussions which
contain reasonable arguments
like those suggested which are not then countered by piled-on "nn, delete"
entries; even better would be a "nn, delete" replaced with a "keep"
result of listening to reason. I would like to sooth my tortured soul with
It's old now, but I'm proud of
First, it doesn't surprise me that finding a case is so difficult. This case,
however, doesn't really fit here as an example:
1. They changed the content significantly, essentially an article about a different
subject now with only some loose ties.
2. The admin decision was still based on the majority vote.
I'd be interested in a case where the content didn't have to undergo any extreme
changes and the admins action was opposite of the majority. It doesn't have to be
27-3, but a 15-5 would still be an odd case.~~~~Pro-Lick