On 31/03/07, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 31/03/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 31/03/07, James Farrar
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
{{sofixit}}, quite frankly.
Where {{sofixit} != speedy deletion when the article has already been
kept after an AfD.
{{sofixit}} quite often involves a clueful editor or two camping on
the article for months, reverting attempts to turn it into a
hatchetjob. Which is fine; it's what we do with [[George W. Bush]]
every day. But we only have so many clueful editors with time to
spare, and this process simply runs out after a time.
Indeed, but carping on the sidelines doesn't help either.
Doc is not on the sidelines; this is a complaint from the coalface!
He's one of the people who doesn't scale - I know where he's coming
from, as I was doing much the same before I partly burned out.
There are no shortage of crap articles thast the community vaguely
feels we ought to have, but where no-one steps up to maintain
neutrality and they just sink back into hideousness. We need to figure
out what to do, and just having a committee say "keep, cleanup" every
six months isn't it.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk