On the radio interview: I thought David sounded
unfair, espousing some
unlikely conspiracy theories suggesting that the IWF chose Wikipedia for
any other reason than the fact that some disgruntled Wikipedian submitted
it to their tip box a few days ago.
The idea that they've blocked Wikipedia but not Amazon because Amazon
has more lawyers sounds pretty plausible to me (what else could they
mean by "pragmatic"?). I thought the bit about it being an experiment
sounded rather unlikely, I think it's far more likely that they just
didn't think about what they were doing and have now got themselves
stuck in a corner.