----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] One way to write CC-BY-ND
2009/3/22 Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>om>:
2009/3/22 Jay Litwyn
<brewhaha(a)freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>ca>:
>
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=flickr.com
> I do not like that result, because a [[phish]] artist was or is
> promoting a
> flickr file.
I don't get what that link has to do with
anything... it's saying that
flickr doesn't follow internet standards, that has nothing to do with
CC-BY-ND or phishing...
Indeed. Jay, your posts lately are verging on the incomprehensible.
It is an aside. I find it hard to reconcile NC-SA without specifying media,
so I am not surprised that flickr is going to a third version of their
license. The rest of my message qualifies or specifies ND. flickr is in the
thread's root. I forgot that there are e-mail subscribers to this list.
An aside to what? And you still haven't said what that link was for.
And how did you forget their were email subscribes to this **email
list**? And your email was the root of this thread. You really aren't
making any sense.