Todd Allen wrote:
There's a big difference between something being
identifying and
something just being there. If a company's logo is iconic or widely
discussed, or if the company is known much better by logo than by name,
that argument just might hold water. On the other hand, "Microsoft",
"Coca-Cola", "Chevrolet". I just perfectly well -identified- three
companies without a single image.
Interesting choice. In terms of copyright, two of three logos predate
1923, and showing them would not be a copyvio.
Ec