Anthere wrote:
Rick a écrit:
Where would you suggest? In France, it's
illegal to criticize the
government. In Germany, it's illegal to display Nazi memorabilia.
In the UK there's the Official Secrets Act to deal with.
RickK
May I *seriously* suggest that you consider avoiding libel and
comments that might anger your peers RickK ?
Well, according to the World Press Freedom Committee's document "Insult
Laws: A Insult to Press Freedom"
(
http://www.wpfc.org/site/docs/pdf/Publications/Insult%20Laws-An%20Insult%20…):
"...the primary form of this crime became known as 'insult to the
president of the republic,' whose classic form was set in the French
press law of 1881. It remains the basic press legislation in France
today. The 1881 law also carries serious penalties for insulting
foreign chiefs of state, foreign ministers or ambassadors of friendly
countries, and official bodies like parliament, the judiciary, and armed
forces... Similar provisions are on the books in Austria, Germany, the
Netherlands, Norway, and Spain."
The report goes on to note that the French law was last actually used
under Charles de Gaulle in the 1960s, when a spectator was arrested for
crying out "hoo hoo" at him. More recently the Sun was threatened with
a lawsuit for insulting Chirac, though this never materialized.
The report also notes that the French law has served as an example for
many laws in other countries, especially less-developed countries, and
especially former French colonies, that *are* enforced, and those
countries defend their law under "well, France has such laws, so why
shouldn't we?"
So "illegal to criticize" is going too far, but it's not entirely
without basis either.
-Mark
So...wait a minute here...
If I understand well...
There is a law that says it is illegal to criticize the french governement
That law was used only *once* in 125 years.
It was exactly *44* years ago
And *we* should be considered responsible that freedom of speech is
*not* respected in *other* countries, because other countries took
example on us ?
And *that* would be an argument to claim France does not respect freedom
of speech and should not host Wikipedia ?
And *this* is not meant to be insulting ?
Please, consider this very carefully