Christiaan Briggs said:
No more so than is taking place with controversial
images already. And
as Nicholas has noted categories are highly unlikely to be have such
vague labels as "offensive". The point, remember, is that we are trying
to identify not "offensive" but "potentially offensive"
As we've discovered in recent discussions, there is no firm agreement on
what constitutes potentially offensive content. Some are holding even the
hammer and sickle to be potentially offensive, while others have used the
word "taste" in describing a picture of an abused child.