doing away with the whole concept of letting "any idiot" who creates an
account vote on such a
matter?
You mean like creating a hated cabal of long-term users or admins who are
the only ones who can delete articles? sounds just great, and really in line
with whole "anyone can edit" idea.
On 6/20/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/20/07, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Primarily I'm thinking about living
biographies. If an article is
substantially a description of events in the life of a living person,
then we should perhaps consider "if in doubt, delete". We already
have a "Living people" category so in most cases it should be easy
enough to identify such articles.
Groovy so delete every article on an election (bound to have a
negative portrayal of someone). I rather doubt that le Pen likes our
article on the last french presidential election.
I think it's still running. Generally those
articles aren't
biographies, however, so I don't really understand the relevance, if
any.
They generally contain biographical details such as say alumni or
stuff about the head.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l