doing away with the whole concept of letting "any idiot" who creates an account vote on such a
matter?
You mean like creating a hated cabal of long-term users or admins who are the only ones who can delete articles? sounds just great, and really in line with whole "anyone can edit" idea.
On 6/20/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/20/07, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
Primarily I'm thinking about living biographies. If an article is substantially a description of events in the life of a living person, then we should perhaps consider "if in doubt, delete". We already have a "Living people" category so in most cases it should be easy enough to identify such articles.
Groovy so delete every article on an election (bound to have a negative portrayal of someone). I rather doubt that le Pen likes our article on the last french presidential election.
I think it's still running. Generally those articles aren't biographies, however, so I don't really understand the relevance, if any.
They generally contain biographical details such as say alumni or stuff about the head.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l