--- Daniel Ehrenberg name12323@hotmail.com wrote:
Should user pages should be protected for that username only? It would make sense, because that's who it's intended for. But maybe not because then someone could post any libelous or offensive content they wanted. Maybe sysops and the user should be able to edit the users page. What do you think? Would it destroy the Wiki concept or help free speech and protection of the page? Is it worth changing or thinking about?
Hello list
Maybe the username page could be protected against any edition done by any other user except the logued in user. If the logued in user is abusing us in posting insanity, discussion with him would be enough to drive him out of the idea. Just like some users were asked by the community to change their user name because it did not please the community. The choice of a user name and of a user page content is free as long as community is happy with it. Similarly, regular sysop have no possibility now to change a user name; why would they have the right to change the content of the page ? The user name and the user page are his image.
Yours
Athypique
___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com