Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote: Erik Moeller wrote:
On 7/5/06, geni wrote:
On 7/5/06, Erik Moeller wrote:
The page was now deleted, in spite of no consensus, and in spite of a very large amount of blog coverage and a newspaper report in Politiken about it.
Slight majority in favor of keep in fact. on that basis I've undeleted.
Thanks. Now get ready for the accusations of starting a "wheel war."
And now it's deleted again. It's been put up for review at
.
I don't frequent AfD so perhaps I get a skewed impression, but does anyone think that the prevalence of extremely hyperbolic "strong" >>voting is on the increase? AfD isn't even supposed to be a vote in the first place, technically, so giving a vote to "Destroy, pillage and salt the earth of this accursed article" or "Strong strong strong KEEP" seems kind of silly and pointless. The calls to _ban_ article contributors and/or people who voted to keep the article are even more silly, well over into the realm of blatantly stupid - AfD is not ArbCom, the very notion of crossing the two gives me the heebie-jeebies. Maybe it's >>just these specific highly contentious arguments where that sort of thing happens.
I think the problem with DRV and other processes that reivew content is the entire premise. I reviewed a backlog previously to discover a template. To my horror, it noted:
"The community is interested in process not content".
This is madness. - Randall Brackett _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.