Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote: Erik Moeller wrote:
On 7/5/06, geni wrote:
On 7/5/06, Erik Moeller wrote:
> The page was now deleted, in spite of no consensus, and in spite of a
> very large amount of blog coverage and a newspaper report in Politiken
> about it.
Slight majority in favor of keep in fact. on that
basis I've undeleted.
Thanks. Now get ready for the accusations of starting a "wheel war."
>And now it's deleted again. It's been put
up for review at
.
>I don't frequent AfD so perhaps I get a skewed
impression, but does
>anyone think that the prevalence of extremely hyperbolic "strong"
>>voting
>is on the increase? AfD isn't even supposed to be a vote in the first
>place, technically, so giving a vote to "Destroy, pillage and salt the
>earth of this accursed article" or "Strong strong strong KEEP" seems
>kind of silly and pointless. The calls to _ban_ article contributors
>and/or people who voted to keep the article are even more silly, well
>over into the realm of blatantly stupid - AfD is not ArbCom, the very
>notion of crossing the two gives me the heebie-jeebies. Maybe it's >>just
>these specific highly contentious arguments where that sort of thing
>happens.
I think the problem with DRV and other processes that reivew content is the entire
premise. I reviewed a backlog previously to discover a template. To my horror, it
noted:
"The community is interested in process not content".
This is madness. - Randall Brackett
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.