On Thursday 13 March 2008 00:41, Todd Allen wrote:
And if such sourcing does exist, -and is reliable- (e.g., not
fansites, blogs, forums, etc.),
Which are not necessarily unreliable.
How's this: instead of having these ridiculous blanket rules pigeonholing what
is and is not a reliable source, perhaps defer to people who are actually
familiar with the subject matter--they're more likely to know what is and is
not considered a reliable source within that domain.
--
Kurt Weber
<kmw(a)armory.com>