On Thursday 13 March 2008 00:41, Todd Allen wrote:
And if such sourcing does exist, -and is reliable- (e.g., not fansites, blogs, forums, etc.),
Which are not necessarily unreliable.
How's this: instead of having these ridiculous blanket rules pigeonholing what is and is not a reliable source, perhaps defer to people who are actually familiar with the subject matter--they're more likely to know what is and is not considered a reliable source within that domain.