2009/8/27 Andrew Turvey andrewrturvey@googlemail.com:
----- "Andrew Gray" andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
The all-BLPs idea seems to have been abandoned.
I can't find anywhere in the trial pages saying this - where did you find that?
Inference ;-)
"Thus, it is proposed to enable patrolled revisions, which uses a passive flag that reviewers can use to mark a revision patrolled, for monitoring purposes, but that has no effect on the version viewed by readers. This passive flag is available for all articles. Flagged protection is a proposal to allow administrators to enable an active flag on a given article, 'flag protecting' it. Reviewers can flag revisions, and the version viewed by readers by default on (semi) flagged protected pages is the latest confirmed revision. During the trial, semi flagged protection is intended to be used with the same requirements as for semi-protection, and full flagged protection (see below), with the same requirements as for full-protection"
In short:
Patrolled revisions goes on all articles; flagged protection goes on a case-by-case basis pretty much as (semi-) protection does today.
There's no BLP-article specific rollout in the current plan.