As I thought the poll was, we were approving a trial limited in all
respects to BLP only. We were also discussing a trial on one thing,
not a simultaneous trial of several different proposals. in trying to
see how a complicated new routine works, we should be testing either
flagged revision or patrolled articles first. And if we are going to
test flagged revisions,we should be testing one particular way of
doing it, not three different levels at the same time.
That is, assuming I correctly understand the page Wikipedia:Flagged
protection and patrolled revisions,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_rev…
which is very likely to be an incorrect assumption.
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Thomas Dalton<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/8/27 Andrew Turvey
<andrewrturvey(a)googlemail.com>om>:
----- "Andrew Gray"
<andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
The all-BLPs idea seems to have been abandoned.
I can't find anywhere in the trial pages saying this - where did you find that?
I can't find anywhere in the trial pages that mentions BLPs at all,
other than BLP being one of the policies that needs to be checked by
reviewers.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l