On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, David Levy wrote:
Indeed, that's a different matter altogether. It's reasonable to argue that Wikipedia articles should contain spoiler warnings for the benefit of readers (though the English Wikipedia community has reached consensus to the contrary). This is very different from the idea of providing special editorial control to representatives of articles' subjects.
Using tools that are bots in all but name even when the tool is not supposed to be used for controversial subjects, is not "reaching consensus".