On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, David Levy wrote:
Indeed, that's a different matter altogether.
It's reasonable to
argue that Wikipedia articles should contain spoiler warnings for the
benefit of readers (though the English Wikipedia community has reached
consensus to the contrary). This is very different from the idea of
providing special editorial control to representatives of articles'
Using tools that are bots in all but name even when the tool is not supposed
to be used for controversial subjects, is not "reaching consensus".