On 07/10/2007, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting model, that. Vote for them, probationary
period, repoll
everyone who voted positively the first time - but no-one else - and
see if anything changes.
Not something we could reasonably implement, but perhaps worth working
out on paper as a theoretical exercise for someone else to pick up.
It would be a useful model for probationary adminship if we vastly
open up the input, i.e. everyone who's been around three months. Give
'em another three months with the tools and see what people think of
them after that. We'll get a few more morons getting the tools, but it
would refine expectations nicely.
- d.