On 1/23/06, Phil Boswell <phil.boswell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"Kat Walsh" <mindspillage(a)gmail.com>
wrote in
message news:8e253f560601201327gbd28a80v3b8d847e9c0c0f3e@mail.gmail.com...
[snip]
I also like the idea of "speedy keep"
being more widely used; if
someone comes up with a really strong justification for why something
should not be deleted, particularly if it completely rebuts the
nominator's reason for nominating it, why waste time arguing about it?
Hmmm.
Isn't this what SnowSpinner's {{user recovery}} template was esentially all
about?
You may be thinking of some other template. The one you have named is
placed on userpages by admins who are willing to brave the wrath of
WP:DRV by actually undeleting and userfying (non-copyright infringing,
non-defamatory) stuff for people who want to use it. It's based on a
notice David Gerard put on his talk page a while back.
[...]
I'd think anyone who nominations were getting pulled that often should be
considered for a WP:POINT time-out...
I suggest the we just point at them and laugh.