On 5/30/07, The Mangoe the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/30/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/30/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
Right, but Arbcom is not designed to write or replace policy, and certainly not to override common sense. Now, granted, there are relatively few occasions where a link to a site such as Wikipedia Review is beneficial to the project, but it should be acknowledged that these occasions exist,
Actually, I can't think of any occasion where such a link would be beneficial to the project. What exactly did you have in mind?
Not this again... Someone apparently thought it was worthwhile to cite a criticism from WR in the Expert rebellion discussion. In the case of TNH's blog, it is being used to cite numerous articles. One does not need to think of occaisions; the uses are already out there.
TNH's blog is not an attack site. I can't think of any situation where it would be necessary to link to WR or ED.