On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/30/07, Blu Aardvark
but Arbcom is not designed to write or replace policy, and
certainly not to override common sense. Now, granted, there are
relatively few occasions where a link to a site such as Wikipedia Review
is beneficial to the project, but it should be acknowledged that these
Actually, I can't think of any occasion where such a link would be
beneficial to the project. What exactly did you have in mind?
Not this again... Someone apparently thought it was worthwhile to cite
a criticism from WR in the Expert rebellion discussion. In the case of
TNH's blog, it is being used to cite numerous articles. One does not
need to think of occaisions; the uses are already out there.
TNH's blog is not an attack site. I can't think of any situation where
it would be necessary to link to WR or ED.