Theresa Knott wrote:
Calling it "disputed science" implies that
it _is_ science that
happens to be disputed by some. However the category contains things
that are clearly _not_ science. So that name is no good. I can't think
of a good replacement name myself though.
Well, [[eugenics]] is in the category (or has been on and off), and
isn't non-science, or at least not "clearly" non-science. (It varies
from outright quackery that'd qualify as pseudoscience, to morally
questionable but scientifically rigorous proposals, such as those in the
early 20th century by the New England Journal of Medicine to sterilize
people who had heritable diseases.)
-Mark