Theresa Knott wrote:
Calling it "disputed science" implies that it _is_ science that happens to be disputed by some. However the category contains things that are clearly _not_ science. So that name is no good. I can't think of a good replacement name myself though.
Well, [[eugenics]] is in the category (or has been on and off), and isn't non-science, or at least not "clearly" non-science. (It varies from outright quackery that'd qualify as pseudoscience, to morally questionable but scientifically rigorous proposals, such as those in the early 20th century by the New England Journal of Medicine to sterilize people who had heritable diseases.)
-Mark