Agree with Sam, I'm not supporting Jimmy because it's clear in calling
himself the sole founder he is wrong & shouldn't do it, but I really
don't see the need to continue this issue. There is no tiptoeing around
Jimmy Wales as can be seen by many people's views on here(I'm sure he's
reading it) & in Wikipedia articles. There is a general consensus that
on this particular matter, Jimmy is unreliable & almost everyone agrees,
so why the continuation?
If there is anyone here who believes that Jimmy is right & is the sole &
only founder, please make yourself known, otherwise can we just end this
pointless, yes pointless, feud.
Just my view! :,)
On 09/04/2009 17:33, Sam Korn wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Larry Sanger
<sanger-lists(a)citizendium.org> wrote:
In the end, assuming the Wikipedia community and
Board reacts to this in a
mature, decent manner, it could come out of this stronger and better. On
the other hand, if you pretend that it isn't happening, or dismiss my
concerns, you'll just be digging yourselves even deeper into the hole you're
already in. Remember: the world is watching.
What hole are we in, pray?
Your concerns seem to be that Jimmy is not acknowledging your role and
status as you'd like, and that the community and the Board are silent
in the face of Jimmy's doing this. For my part, this silence may be
attributed to insouciance -- I care little for the minutiae of history
now eight years old and for your personal (yes, personal) dispute with
Jimmy.
Perhaps you can explain what the world at large, the Wikipedia
community and I personally gain from publicly pursuing it.