On 09/14/04 20:18, Matthew Larsen wrote:
1) If there is a stable edit of an article, people
will revert from
the latest edit to a stable version
Considering how much some people do this with favoured versions ...
3) It will probably take the review board a long time
to get through a
substantial amount of articles, if they even agree
That's a big worry. Mav compared the process to WP:FAC ... which is getting
through more articles lately, but there's NO DAMN WAY it can be considered
a model of scaling.
The review process I think would need to be more naturally a wiki or wikilike
process to scale to any significant percentage of the articles.
6) As someone said earlier this isnt truely in the
spirit of the project
More specifically, it seems to directly repudiate the wiki concept.
- d.