On 26/09/06, Carl Peterson <carlopeterson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Have fun deciding on the name of some of the schools.
In Louisville, at
least, some of the schools have three or four names by which they're known,
and it's often not a matter of abbreviations or the use of a full name
versus last name only. Even if you go by the Board of Education's
"canonical" name for a school, there are still sometimes two or three
variants. For example, we have a school that used to be separate middle and
high schools. While it's technically "Moore Traditional School," even in
the
official higher-up circles, the school is still treated as if it were two
separate schools. It just happens to have a single principal.
No no no - *you* have fun deciding which gets the real name and which
gets the canonical name!
This will (a) include all verifiable schools (b)
having the entry be a
> redirect to a list until there's something real to write an article
> about will save on people coughing up their own skulls in disgust.
Sound's about like what I've been suggesting,
list-wise. When we implemented
the list for Louisville, it has appeared to slow down the number of school
articles that are created for Louisville.
Yep. And thus school inclusionism resolves to something everyone can
at least tolerate without killing themselves *today*.
- d.