Ken Arromdee wrote:
Now has a Slashdot story:
http://slashdot.org/submission/1137140/Climategate-spreads-to-Wikipedia
Which links to two articles:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=62e1c98e-01ed-…
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/05/03/who-i…
At a minimum this sounds like conflict of interest, and worse if any of these
accusations are true (although the article counts are probably misreporting,
and I bet they include all articles he deleted and all banned users regardless
of associations with climate change).
Erm, you wouldn't be jumping to any conclusions here? And
misinterpreting what we mean by "conflict of interest"? Which does not
equate to academic involvement in a topic (no longer William's
situation, by the way?) Or neglecting quite a substantial history of
dispute resolution down the years, which at minimum involves people who
actually understand policy looking at actual edits?
Charles