On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Matthew Brown wrote:
It's appropriate to cite our decision as
supporting an interpretation
of policy that generally allows for the removal of links to attack
sites, however.
Of course.
The problem is people citing the decision as supporting an interpretation
that says "blindly remove all such links all the time regardless of any other
circumstances". A policy of *generally* removing such links is fine; a policy
of removing them literally every single time is what the decision is being
taken to mean.