On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Matthew Brown wrote:
It's appropriate to cite our decision as supporting an interpretation of policy that generally allows for the removal of links to attack sites, however.
Of course.
The problem is people citing the decision as supporting an interpretation that says "blindly remove all such links all the time regardless of any other circumstances". A policy of *generally* removing such links is fine; a policy of removing them literally every single time is what the decision is being taken to mean.