On 11/17/05, Tom Cadden <thomcadden(a)yahoo.ie> wrote:
Incorrect. As it makes clear, it is governing
appropiate editing styles, and used to prevent inappropriate editing style. 'Good
reason', which is a term used in official reasoning on Wikipedia and elsewhere, sets a
high bench mark which means 'an convincing and conclusive argument that in this one
case an exception may need to be made'. It which does not cover arguments like 'we
I like this', and 'I think this probably will at some stage in the future become
the most used term, therefore we should push it here'. That is just POVing and is not
remotely near the standard 'good reason' requires.
To quote you: incorrect. A good reason can be "we really really want to".
qv HHGTG
Sam