Someone wrote:
I don't know how hard that'd be, but
couldn't the bots ignore (just
report) mispelled words between quotes? ''like that'' or
"that"?
If the mispelling (talking about common mistakes here, like taht, not
words which can have different spelling/meanings :) is intended, it is
probably meaning something, so the word or expression is probably
emphazised (hum, what's the spelling? :)) to show, in the article
itself, that the mispelling IS intended.
Bots correcting spelling mistakes are an unfortunate idea. It's just a
guess, but I believe they'd do more harm than good. If you look at the edit
history of
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_verbs_in_English_consisting_of_Latin_
prefix_and_Latin_verb you can see how hard it can be to correct spelling
mistakes manually. Any form of automated correction would just cause
confusion.
A MUCH better way would be not to make spelling mistakes in the first place.
I honestly believe it can be done.
KF