Someone wrote:
I don't know how hard that'd be, but couldn't the bots ignore (just report) mispelled words between quotes? ''like that'' or "that"? If the mispelling (talking about common mistakes here, like taht, not words which can have different spelling/meanings :) is intended, it is probably meaning something, so the word or expression is probably emphazised (hum, what's the spelling? :)) to show, in the article itself, that the mispelling IS intended.
Bots correcting spelling mistakes are an unfortunate idea. It's just a guess, but I believe they'd do more harm than good. If you look at the edit history of http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_verbs_in_English_consisting_of_Latin_ prefix_and_Latin_verb you can see how hard it can be to correct spelling mistakes manually. Any form of automated correction would just cause confusion.
A MUCH better way would be not to make spelling mistakes in the first place. I honestly believe it can be done.
KF