In reality, many businesses and individuals have filtering in place to prevent access to pages that include certain keywords. I've sometimes been stymied when following a legitimate link when I'm on a computer that has some form of net nanny software.
As it turns out, it seems that software isn't all that great and can significantly affect performance. And certainly we don't know much about what expectations they had if WMF projects accepted the "free" offer.
Risker
On 10 September 2012 16:08, Bob the Wikipedian bobthewikipedian@gmail.comwrote:
Re-read what I wrote. I didn't say "best". Having never browsed around specifically for porn, and Wikipedia having been the only site that's put porn in my face without my asking for it, on top of the fact Wikipedia has an excellent categorization system and is allowed even in the workplace and schools, and is a globally-famous site, this qualifies my statement.
On 9/10/2012 2:19 PM, Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bob the Wikipedian bobthewikipedian@gmail.com wrote:
I can't imagine a site more accessible and better organized than Wikipedia for someone seeking porn. They're quite correct.
Bob
Really? Wikipedia is the best porn site you can imagine? Welcome to
the Internets, Bob, take a look around.
______________________________**_________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikien-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
______________________________**_________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikien-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l