On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Bob the Wikipedian
Re-read what I wrote. I didn't say
"best". Having never browsed around
specifically for porn, and Wikipedia having been the only site that's put
porn in my face without my asking for it, on top of the fact Wikipedia has
an excellent categorization system and is allowed even in the workplace and
schools, and is a globally-famous site, this qualifies my statement.
I've re-read both your posts. In the second, quoted above, it sounds
like you are saying that for someone who isn't looking for porn,
Wikipedia is an easy place to find it. But in your original message,
you said Wikipedia was ideal "...for someone seeking porn." But of
course that isn't true. People who are seeking porn will, in all
likelihood, find actual porn. Wikipedia, contra your assertion, is
certainly not the easiest place to find it.
"Blocked sites" are hardly an impediment - Google Image search isn't
blocked anywhere Google itself is accessible, and any sexual search
term will return a thousand thousand images with nothing for a
filtering program to block. By the same token, the fame (or lack) of a
particular site is irrelevant.