Steve Bennett wrote:
Now, what's interesting is to think about where most of the
"deliberate POV" problems in our encyclopaedia reside:
- Currently trading companies
- Political parties, governments etc
- Other living people
- Religions
- Certain highly emotive debates (abortion, circumcision,
neurolinguistic programming - for reasons beyond my comprehension)
Add crackpot science as the next down in frequency - Hillman has
mostly had to contend with freaky ideas about general relativity
and the like. Although these are usually individuals rather than
interest groups, they often have sufficient energy to sweep through
a whole bunch of articles, and they are clever enough to use
multiple sockpuppets to cover their tracks. These kinds of additions
tend to be well-referenced, and only an expert would recognize that
the references are either bogus or irrelevant.
Stan