Nathan wrote:
Honestly? You can't think if anything the
Foundation could do with more
money, or a more stable stream of income?
But that's not what I asked. I asked what the Foundation *needed*
more money for, what it was currently failing at without more money.
(And you didn't answer either question.)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Steve Summit
<scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
> Somehow, whenever the topic of advertising on Wikipedia is
> discussed, I always miss the description of the goals which are
> financially unsupportable without the kinds of income which can
> only be achieved through advertising. What are they? What is
> it that we're failing to do today due to lack of money?