On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:24:40 +1000, you wrote:
I can't believe you are genuinely surprised that
the other
editors on that page had had enough and sort administrative
intervention after you ignored numerous appeals to stop.
Seeking administrative intervention was discussed openly on
the article's talk page. But you ignored that, too.
I agree. On the other hand, I also agree that putting *also known as
"The King of Pop" or "Wacko Jacko"* in the first para is absurd.
This
is supposed to be an encyclopaedia. I have no time whatsoever for POV
pushers and edit warriors (oh, wait, that would be me, I guess) but
given that these are informal usage only, I would be surprised if
other encyclopaedias included it in the lead like that. Sure, have it
in the article, but not in the first para.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG