On 5/30/07, Sheldon Rampton <sheldon(a)prwatch.org> wrote:
Someone
who commits libel or stalking can be taken to court and convicted,
fined, even jailed. If Wikipedia Review is committing those sorts of
crimes, the victims can pursue legal remedies and get a court
judgment so that we have a basis for common agreement that WR's
actions do indeed reach the level of criminality that those terms
imply. Once someone has won a court judgment showing that WR has
engaged in illegal harassment, I would accept a policy saying that
Wikipedia should ban all links to websites whose owners have been
convicted of criminal harassment against Wikipedians.
But only criminal harassment? Libel wouldn't be enough?