My problem is that not requiring a warning encourages gaming by making it easier for a more savvy edit warrior to take advantage of another editor and play "gotcha". This is particularly the case as most editors aren't aware of the new "unrelated reverts" interpretation. If someone is savvy enough to complain on ANI/3RR they should be capable of giving someone a warning first, especially if they are a participant in the edit war.
On 6/23/06, Zero megamanzero521@yahoo.com wrote:
Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote: On 6/23/06, Conrad Dunkerson wrote: Some people do
indeed get blocked under 3RR without having any idea what it is.
If they are blocked, they would presumably be aware that they had >>been engaged in edit warring. It's pretty difficult to get oneself blocked f one persistently fails to misbehave.
I'm inclined to agree with Tony on this matter. Tea and crumpets are good for the mind, good for body, good for the spirit.
Joining the Harmonious editing club might assist in refraining from edit warring. My "membership" has assisted in keeping the urge to revert in content disputes to an appropriate manner. -Zero
Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Football '06 - Go with the leader. Start your league today! _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l