My problem is that not requiring a warning encourages gaming by making it
easier for a more savvy edit warrior to take advantage of another editor and
play "gotcha". This is particularly the case as most editors aren't aware
of
the new "unrelated reverts" interpretation. If someone is savvy enough to
complain on ANI/3RR they should be capable of giving someone a warning
first, especially if they are a participant in the edit war.
On 6/23/06, Zero <megamanzero521(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote: On 6/23/06, Conrad
Dunkerson wrote:
Some people do
indeed get blocked under 3RR without having any
idea what it is.
>If they are blocked, they would presumably be
aware that they had >>been
>engaged in edit warring. It's pretty difficult to get oneself blocked
>f one persistently fails to misbehave.
I'm inclined to agree with Tony on this matter. Tea and crumpets are
good for the mind, good for body, good for the spirit.
Joining the Harmonious editing club might assist in refraining
from edit warring. My "membership" has assisted in keeping the urge
to revert in content disputes to an appropriate manner. -Zero
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Football '06 - Go with the leader. Start your league
today!
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l