On 04/04/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:41:59 +0100, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
And if that is the case, how does the succession box fit in?
Probably shows too few at once to be a big deal. I suspect their concern is their ability to sell for profit books detailing the chronology of the charts. But that's only a guess.
In which case, we'd better remove it. Just in case we get sued.