On 04/04/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:41:59 +0100, "James
Farrar"
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And if that is the case, how does the succession
box fit in?
Probably shows too few at once to be a big deal. I suspect their
concern is their ability to sell for profit books detailing the
chronology of the charts. But that's only a guess.
In which case, we'd better remove it. Just in case we get sued.