Oh please dont bring up ME in this, Mr. "due to time
restriants I only cheak reported violations" and "Yes
I should have blocked the other party but it wasn't
reported" and "I was contacterble by email for as long
as the block lasted."
If you want to defend the process of enforcing da
rulez, it might help matters if you actually followed
the rules in doing so.
Granted its a sticky issue and one which we all forsaw
when 3RR was first started. The "equal treatment"
clause began as a core requirement and now (judging by
how easily you and others dismiss it) its just an
overlooked footnote.
Stevertigo
--- geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/13/05, Leif Knutsen <vyerllc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm not even going to bother to go into why a
recent 3RR block of me was
unjust and unwarranted, and probably abusive.
What
interests me more is what
appears to be the immunity enjoyed by admins. I
reported one of you for
vandalism three times in the last few days,
documented the three specific
instances and countless others, and nobody
(except
the perp) even responded,
let alone acted on the complaint.
I'm just curious: how many cases have there been
of an admin being subject
to disciplinary action, either in the form of
blocks, long-term blocks,
being deprived of admin rights, or outright
expulsion? What I see - even
from admins I have learned to respect - is that
admins generally stand up
for each other first and last, whether they
harbor
reservations after the
fact.
Leif
Under the 3RR I've blocked 5 admins. Two of those
cases resulted in
further actions which in tern cuased the admin to be
de admined. There
is at least one block of an admin under the 3RR that
was not carried
out by me.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around