--- Omegatron omegatron+wikienl@gmail.com wrote:
I'm basing this concept of "primary and secondary goals" on the wording of the fair use policy page itself. The way the page is currently worded, writing a high-quality encyclopedia is a means to the end of creating free content. This is quite a silly notion, to me at least.
That would be quite a silly notion, but nobody is arguing that.
Wikipedia is a Wikimedia Foundation project, and "Wikimedia Foundation is dedicated to the development and maintenance of online free, open content encyclopedias, collections of quotations, textbooks and other collections of documents, information, and other informational databases in all the languages of the world that will be distributed free of charge to the public under a free documentation license such as the Free Documentation License written by the Free Software Foundation Inc. at http://www.fsf.org or similar licensing scheme, see http://www.wikimedia.org."
The goal includes freedom.
So we allow non-free content whenever it is encyclopedic, legal and doesn't displace equivalent free content.
No, we don't. I refer you to [[WP:FAIR]] for the actual policy.
I think you mean "It's fruitless to try to reach a consensus about the details of any particular policy when a small group of users have modified it to suit their ideals and are unwilling to compromise".
No, I mean what I actually said: "It seems fruitless to argue about the details of any particular policy if we disagree on the purpose of the project."
-- Matt
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Crypto Blog: http://cipher-text.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________________ The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html