Robert wrote:
Mr-Natural-Health made the statement that he is a Nazi;
he
said this to me on my User page because I am am Jewish.
This is very hateful. He is even sending private hate mail
to people he disagrees with. For instance:
====
To: "RK"
Subject: RK, the Arse!
From: "Mr-Natural-Health" <johnhgohde(a)yahoo.com>
To: "RK"
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 19:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
You are an Arse! Just thought that you might want to
know. :)
====
It is not just me; in a very short time many in the
Wikipedia community have come to the conclusion that
Mr-Natural-Health is a threat. Please see for yourself by
reading the comments on his User page; every time someone
tries to discuss things with him, he belittles and insults
them, and then attacks them.
These kinds of statements are clearly a breach of etiquette, and have no
relationship to the medical issues that form the substantive part of the
debate. At the same time I can understand that he is in a situation
where he feels beset by a pack of dogs, and that can be an irrational
driving force to his words. The reaction to his writing has been
combattive from the beginning, with no attempt whatsoever to find a
common ground. Several of his opponents start from the closed-minded
presumption that he is absolutely wrong.
Mr-Natural-health has repeatedly stated that he plans
on
coming back to Wikipedia with other ISP under false names,
and that he will not let anyone alter his edits. This is
explicit admission of vandalism.
The fact is that he has not been banned. Exploring that avenue is pure
speculation, even if he does make that threat.
In any case, the edits he makes include gross
falsehoods,
distortions, fabrications, and paranoia. I am distubred by
the way that Ec and a few others are defending this
disturbed individual and his "work". I had planned to stay
off Wiki-En for good, but in this case seeing this man
defended, instead of banned, was too much.
I make no apologies for defending his work. Just because a handful of
us are defending a minority position should not be cause for being
disturbed. You have elsewhere objected to what you called ad hominem
arguments, and you are right to complain when MrNH calls your sanity
into question, or calls himself a Nazi as a means of attacking your
Jewishness by innuendo. But what are "gross falsehoods, distortions,
fabrications, and paranoia" but ad hominem arguments. Setting up
peer-reviewed double-blind experiments as the only standard for
accepting medical practices is far too rigid an outlook on medicine.
Other things do work, though imperfectly documented.Giving credence to
alternative medicine should not be seen as supporting quackery.
Outright fraud does exist, but the defrauders are a ninority that get
an overblown share of the publicity. Most alternative practitioners
like most mainstream doctors ply their trade with complete honesty and
are consistent with their own beliefs
A few contributors to Wiki-En forum seem devoid of
common
sense; it would be a shame if their lack of sense allowed
Wikipedia to be damaged by allowing wackos free reign.
Isn't "wacko" also an ad hominem term?
Ec