On 8/8/07, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, only developers with root access can see and restore the oversighted
> edit. Furthermore, this is managed directly by the local wikis ArbCom, see
> the hiding revisions page. They delegate who gets the oversight right and
> can view the log if need be (most of the current and past members have the
> right). In addition, the developers know to listen to them if they need
> access to the revision, although in most cases the revisions do not need to
> be restored.
>
> I am not sure if there is a bugzilla report for it. But keep in mind that
> you must have Foundation-wide community discussion before such a change
> takes place. Either way, Brion knows about it and I am sure VoiceOfAll will
> bother him with it.
>
>
> On 8/8/07, Armed Blowfish <diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So one needs read access to the Linux filesystem of the Wikimedia
> > servers to look at an oversighted edit?
> >
> > That would seem to make Oversight a bigger deal than it ought to be.
> > There are a number of things one might not want every admin to be able
> > to see, but which one might want to keep accessible to ArbCom, etc. :
> > (
> >
> > Is there a Bugzilla report filed somewhere to get the bitfields
> > extension committed?
> >
> > Armed Blowfish
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Casey Brown
> Cbrown1023
>
> ---
> Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails
> sent to
> this address will probably get lost.
>
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.