No, only developers with root access can see and restore the oversighted
edit. Furthermore, this is managed directly by the local wikis ArbCom, see
the hiding revisions page. They delegate who gets the oversight right and
can view the log if need be (most of the current and past members have the
right). In addition, the developers know to listen to them if they need
access to the revision, although in most cases the revisions do not need to
be restored.
I am not sure if there is a bugzilla report for it. But keep in mind that
you must have Foundation-wide community discussion before such a change
takes place. Either way, Brion knows about it and I am sure VoiceOfAll will
bother him with it.
On 8/8/07, Armed Blowfish <diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
So one needs read access to the Linux filesystem of the Wikimedia
servers to look at an oversighted edit?
That would seem to make Oversight a bigger deal than it ought to be.
There are a number of things one might not want every admin to be able
to see, but which one might want to keep accessible to ArbCom, etc. :
(
Is there a Bugzilla report filed somewhere to get the bitfields
extension committed?
Armed Blowfish
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails
sent to
this address will probably get lost.
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.