Hi! I think it might be a good idea. We have a number of "flavors" in the data now, that include different aspects of RDF. E.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityData/Q1.ttl?flavor=simple produces only "simple" statements, flavor=full produces everything we know, and flavor=dump produces the same things we have in RDF dump. We can of course create new flavors with different aspects included or excluded. So what should default RDF content display? We also have a tracking bug for this: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101837 so maybe we should discuss it there. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev(a)wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Hi! I think it might be a good idea. We have a number of "flavors" in the data now, that include different aspects of RDF. E.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityData/Q1.ttl?flavor=simple produces only "simple" statements, flavor=full produces everything we know, and flavor=dump produces the same things we have in RDF dump. We can of course create new flavors with different aspects included or excluded. So what should default RDF content display? We also have a tracking bug for this: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101837 so maybe we should discuss it there.