Ah, thanks, Luke. I thought it was constrained to only the main entity and
not just any claims from a Wikipedia page. But it seems that the
description is pretty clear there ...
Describes claims imported from Wikimedia projects like Wikipedia, either by
bots or manually. For other sources, use "stated
in" (P248) (English)
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:56 PM Lucas Werkmeister <mail(a)lucaswerkmeister.de>
wrote:
I’ve added a second reference with, as far as I know,
the preferred way to
model this: “imported from Wikimedia project” + “Wikimedia import URL” (via
the “permanent link” in the sidebar on the Wikipedia article). I’m not sure
if a “retrieved” date should also be added.
Cheers,
Lucas
On 06.03.19 01:45, Thad Guidry wrote:
How are folks commonly giving references back to Wikipedia page mentions?
My use case seems to be causing a constraint violation and I'd like to
know how to better handle that reference case.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61976849
Thanks in advance!
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing
listWikidata@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata